Nature of Thought Paper Free Essays

This will paper will explain the critical thinking process. It will explain the sensing process and define memory, it will also identify what medium is. Last but no least it will Identify personal barriers and describe thoughts. We will write a custom essay sample on Nature of Thought Paper or any similar topic only for you Order Now Sensing process has to do with the way humans perceive things like seeing, hearing, smell, taste and touch. Humans perceive stimuli from the outside and inside of their body. Sensing controls the way the brain functions it allows people to pick up on vibes, and have gut feelings about certain situations. Sensing helps the brain observe and get ideas about things that are happening around them. People are able to pick up on things easily, and suspect things without even knowing what the situation might be. Memory is the process that is used to store information in the brain in which it makes it easier to retain, and retrieve information from it later on. There are three major processes that make up the memory process. Encoding: is the process that forms new memories and information by changing into usable form. Once information has been locked into the brain, it is stored in the memory for later use. Stored memory: can be found outside of our awareness the majority of the time, except for when it needs to be used. Retrieval process allows the human brain to bring memories that have been stored back into awareness and conscious. Without the process of memory people would not be able to do their daily activities in which they need in order to survive in life. Medium is the language that is used for communication it is designed to transmit information from a speaker to a writer. Medium is the sender, audience and receiver. My perception was far from the actual facts when I thought that my boyfriend felt the same way about me as I felt about him. In beginning everything was  great he acted like he was so much in love with me but in reality it was lie. Going into our second year of our relationship my boyfriend told me that he wasn’t in love with me he said that he really liked me but he didn’t love me because he does not know what love is. When he told me this I did not know what to do I felt very heartbroken and confused. Outline your own perceptual process. What did you think was going on? I thought that our feelings were mutual, I thought that he and I were building a strong relationship and one day we were going to get married. What was really going on? Our relationship was based on a lie he made me believe that his feelings were mutual but in reality he was living a lie, he was playing games with my heart. Why was there such a difference? I believed that our relationship was going good and that we were in love. Meanwhile his feelings were totally different and he was only with me because of the things I could do for him. How did language empower or limit the expression of your thoughts? Hearing the words come out verbally triggered my emotions, I felt angry and sad from the words he told me. What did you learn about your thinking by evaluating the situation again? I learned that I could never trust him again, I also learned to reserve myself and not jump into things so quickly. Personal barriers are factors that prevent people from achieving their goals or it may cause them to behave rationally about a situation. Personal barriers are difficult to get rid of because they result from habits and thought patterns. Recognizing personal barriers in order to help with success in relationships, finances and personal development is the best way for human beings to be able to remove personal barriers from their life. Thoughts are when people come up with ideas and opinions in their head thoughts are produced when thinking occurs in the mind. Thoughts can also be described as a mental picture that is contemplated. Thoughts helps the thinking process run smoothly by allowing the brain to be able to make decisions. My thoughts were influenced by the personal barrier denial. I was in denial about the things my boyfriend told me. My personal barrier would not allow my thoughts to register clearly I was in denial about my feelings, I didn’t want to believe the truth. Thoughts can be manipulated by personal barriers when the mind doesn’t allow the brain to deal with the situation a move. Instead of moving on our personal barriers take over our mind in which it causes us to lash out and make hasty decisions. Critical thinking is a very crucial topic it helps people understand how the human brain works. Without the thinking process our life would be a vegetable. Thinking help us be able to survive in the world and learn from our mistakes. How to cite Nature of Thought Paper, Papers Nature of Thought Paper Free Essays Nature of Thought Paper Robert D. Morris II University of Phoenix Online PHL 251 Devon Smith * * Nature of Thought Paper * * The idea of thought in and of itself requires critical thinking to define. Thinking is an abstract concept that could take on virtually any definition provided to it. We will write a custom essay sample on Nature of Thought Paper or any similar topic only for you Order Now In fact, I quote something I once stated which was â€Å"Critical Thinking is our personal way of receiving information (whether it be verbal, written, visual, or received by one of our other senses), evaluating the information against our beliefs, experiences, situation, external factors and ultimately coming to a decision. (Morris, 2012). * Having stated and quoted that, there are many times when my perception of a situation does not represent the reality of the situation. One’s personal influence on how they interpret facts and information through their cultural beliefs and emotions can have drastic impacts on the output and their view of the situation. I can remember back to a recent job I applied for. I was very interested in working for SAP America. I had been supporting SAP solutions at a public utility I had been working for, but I felt like at SAP I could make a larger impact. Although SAP is a large company with many careers paths, there were two career paths I con sidered. The first was position as a consultant which is a position where I would help utility companies who have purchased the SAP software implement them. This was a position much closer to what I was already doing with my current company. The second and the one in which I applied for was a position where I develop solution suites and then demo the solutions to the utilities considering purchasing software to meet their business needs. Upon researching the position, I had come to a specific understanding of what the role was and it turned out the role was much different than I thought. Why? It was most likely perceptual blocks that caused the disconnection. * Before I discuss the process I used to arrive at my perception of the position, I’d like to describe what I thought the position was as opposed to what the position actually was. First, I believed the position was a technical position that required technical skills in which the primary role is to configure the demo system, be present during demos to demonstrate the system and assist the sales team during technical discussions. * The reality of the role is that this position actually is a sales position. Technical skills are not required but can be helpful, and the individual fulfilling this role in the sales process is there to articulate the value of the software, actively participate in sales discussions, and focus more on selling than on advising, including cross-selling and up-selling. The primary disconnect is that I believed the role to be more technical where the individual supported the sales team, but the role is directly on the sales team. * The perceptual process that was used when arriving at my view of the position looked like the following: * Do I have any personal experience to draw from? * Do I have any information or documentation to review? * Can I find new or more information to review? * Is there anyone I can talk to that can provide information? * Once I gather enough information, I then evaluate the information. I determine the source for credibility and begin to derive a position. In some cases, no matter how much information is available and how credible the source of that information, personal barriers can get in the way of honestly interpreting the information. * One of the reasons there may have been a difference in my perception of the position and the reality of the position could be that in addition to the logical components of my perceptual process, there were also components at a subconscious level influencing my perception as well. In my psyche, I had a picture of the position and I believe I wanted that picture to hold true. Therefore, even as I obtained more knowledge and facts, I may have subconsciously readjusted the way I consumed the information in order for my perception to hold true which as a perceptual block. * When I think back as to how I came to a perceived reality of the position I was applying for, I think the personal barriers that came into play during this process were: denial and rationalization. Personal barriers are personal beliefs or subconscious thoughts that hinder our ability to honestly and accurate assess a situation. In my case and in this situation, I attempted to rationalize what I heard and what I read into logical thoughts that met my expectations. I denied taking what I heard at face value and opted to put my own perceptive spin on the information. * Personal barriers can play a major role in thought and how one perceives reality. In my case I suffered from rationalization and denial, but there are other barriers such as religious barriers, enculturation, projection, and anger (Thinking 2007) to name a few. It is important to recognize these barriers in advance when possible; otherwise resulting decisions can have lasting impacts. In my case I accepted a position that is not exactly what I was looking for. I have a great job, work with great people and for a great company, but the work is not what I was expecting. Some days I really enjoy it where as others not so much. If I had a firm grasp on the role exactly as it is I may not have applied for the position, but I’m not sorry I did and I cannot complain. * REFERENCES Kirby, G. R. , Goodpaster, J. R. , (2007) Thinking: An interdisciplinary approach to critical thinking (4th ed) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall Morris, R. (2012, October 17). Re: Wk 1 DQ-1 â€Å"What is Critical Thinking? † [Online forum Comment]. Retrieved from  https://classroom. phoenix. edu/afm215/secure/view-thread. jspa? threadID=47848193 How to cite Nature of Thought Paper, Essay examples